<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Property Codes Compliance Board independent assessment results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/property-codes-compliance-board-independent-assessment-results-123/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/property-codes-compliance-board-independent-assessment-results-123/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/property-codes-compliance-board-independent-assessment-results-123/comment-page-1/#comment-11856</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=1999#comment-11856</guid>
		<description>The PCCB has been asked to confirm the sample number as it is alleged to be around 10! Not particularly thorough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PCCB has been asked to confirm the sample number as it is alleged to be around 10! Not particularly thorough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/property-codes-compliance-board-independent-assessment-results-123/comment-page-1/#comment-11815</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=1999#comment-11815</guid>
		<description>The detailed investigation by PCCB of over 900 search answers revealed no significant difference etc etc.  Well, with 60 answers for each search, did they just check 15 properties to get the 900 answers.  Evidence provided to them showed exactly where the issues were but this obviously didn&#039;t make it into the checking process. All LA&#039;s have proof that information is not being requested and house buyers/solicitors are being mislead that the information has been obtained from the LA (it states it on the search). Who do we have to contact to get these things put right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The detailed investigation by PCCB of over 900 search answers revealed no significant difference etc etc.  Well, with 60 answers for each search, did they just check 15 properties to get the 900 answers.  Evidence provided to them showed exactly where the issues were but this obviously didn&#8217;t make it into the checking process. All LA&#8217;s have proof that information is not being requested and house buyers/solicitors are being mislead that the information has been obtained from the LA (it states it on the search). Who do we have to contact to get these things put right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HIP-Consultant.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/property-codes-compliance-board-independent-assessment-results-123/comment-page-1/#comment-11678</link>
		<dc:creator>HIP-Consultant.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=1999#comment-11678</guid>
		<description>UPDATE supplied by IPSA

The Association of Independent Personal Search Agents (IPSA)
wishes to clarify details relating to the Property Ombudsman made earlier this week.

Christian Lister, IPSAs chairman wishes to clarify the warning statement given to all estate agents and The Property Ombudsman.

“Following recent communications from The Property
Ombudsman, I can confirm on behalf of IPSA that the
Ombudsman has no intention of allowing the PCCB to conduct
compliance checks on estate agents, the communication also
highlighted that talks on this issue have never taken place.”

IPSA welcomes The Property Ombudsman’s position and
clarification on the PCCB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE supplied by IPSA</p>
<p>The Association of Independent Personal Search Agents (IPSA)<br />
wishes to clarify details relating to the Property Ombudsman made earlier this week.</p>
<p>Christian Lister, IPSAs chairman wishes to clarify the warning statement given to all estate agents and The Property Ombudsman.</p>
<p>“Following recent communications from The Property<br />
Ombudsman, I can confirm on behalf of IPSA that the<br />
Ombudsman has no intention of allowing the PCCB to conduct<br />
compliance checks on estate agents, the communication also<br />
highlighted that talks on this issue have never taken place.”</p>
<p>IPSA welcomes The Property Ombudsman’s position and<br />
clarification on the PCCB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/property-codes-compliance-board-independent-assessment-results-123/comment-page-1/#comment-11593</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=1999#comment-11593</guid>
		<description>At least IPSA and Christian have some &#039;balls&#039; what does everyone else do, oooo apart from take your cash.

The PCCB are the ones alienating themselves, as they do little to help members and am afraid could not even say practical help without turning into dust. 

Cant say i have ever noticed his cute side, maybe u should do a facebook fan page susan :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least IPSA and Christian have some &#8216;balls&#8217; what does everyone else do, oooo apart from take your cash.</p>
<p>The PCCB are the ones alienating themselves, as they do little to help members and am afraid could not even say practical help without turning into dust. </p>
<p>Cant say i have ever noticed his cute side, maybe u should do a facebook fan page susan <img src='http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan D</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/property-codes-compliance-board-independent-assessment-results-123/comment-page-1/#comment-11540</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=1999#comment-11540</guid>
		<description>Christian Lister was without doubt the most talked about person at the Local Land Charges Conference in Blackpool.

quite cute though x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christian Lister was without doubt the most talked about person at the Local Land Charges Conference in Blackpool.</p>
<p>quite cute though x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/property-codes-compliance-board-independent-assessment-results-123/comment-page-1/#comment-11537</link>
		<dc:creator>James Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=1999#comment-11537</guid>
		<description>The only person doing any alienating is Christian Lister, he seems to have a one man crusade to criticise or put barriers between all parties in the conveyancing process. If Christian Lister really knew his members then he&#039;d know that since the 1st of January most of his members have stopped even bothering to attend local authorities and instead submit a LLC1. Kind of puts water on the statements made by PS companies that they were inspecting statutory registers or finding out information during their visit. Unfortunately the PCCB haven&#039;t got the knowledge or experience to realise that just because an answer is in the search that the information was actually inspected to get that answer. It&#039;s just luck and the fact that purchasers won&#039;t rely on HIP searches that there haven&#039;t been any insurance claims for made up answers. But there again most of the insurance policies seem to run out on the day of completion... how convenient!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only person doing any alienating is Christian Lister, he seems to have a one man crusade to criticise or put barriers between all parties in the conveyancing process. If Christian Lister really knew his members then he&#8217;d know that since the 1st of January most of his members have stopped even bothering to attend local authorities and instead submit a LLC1. Kind of puts water on the statements made by PS companies that they were inspecting statutory registers or finding out information during their visit. Unfortunately the PCCB haven&#8217;t got the knowledge or experience to realise that just because an answer is in the search that the information was actually inspected to get that answer. It&#8217;s just luck and the fact that purchasers won&#8217;t rely on HIP searches that there haven&#8217;t been any insurance claims for made up answers. But there again most of the insurance policies seem to run out on the day of completion&#8230; how convenient!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 3/14 queries in 0.039 seconds using disk

Served from: www.hip-consultant.co.uk @ 2012-02-08 07:42:19 -->
