<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grant Shapps to change Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) delivery?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:32:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SthglosHI</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-17784</link>
		<dc:creator>SthglosHI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 19:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-17784</guid>
		<description>I concur with Paul in his response to Jamie&#039;s rather ill considered understanding of matters related to not only the EPC for ewxisting dwellings, but also the broadly similar approach taken when carrying out non invasive HBS surveys.

It may well be that Jamie has had a bad experience though, and we should give him room if this were the case. I have personally been in the building and construction industry for over 20 years and now carry out SAPs, EPCs, for new and existing dwellings as well as commercial and public building energy surveys.

To say heat loss is commonsense is anything but the truth, thermal imaging cameras are now at a reasonable cost level to be used in main stream surveying...and Oh my word what I have uncovered...

If the planet had commonsense it would evict us all!!

Finally Jamie, if your Assessor did not &quot;look&quot; in the roof space report him/her to their Accreditation Body the details can be found in the report next to the Assessors contact details...standards must be maintained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Paul in his response to Jamie&#8217;s rather ill considered understanding of matters related to not only the EPC for ewxisting dwellings, but also the broadly similar approach taken when carrying out non invasive HBS surveys.</p>
<p>It may well be that Jamie has had a bad experience though, and we should give him room if this were the case. I have personally been in the building and construction industry for over 20 years and now carry out SAPs, EPCs, for new and existing dwellings as well as commercial and public building energy surveys.</p>
<p>To say heat loss is commonsense is anything but the truth, thermal imaging cameras are now at a reasonable cost level to be used in main stream surveying&#8230;and Oh my word what I have uncovered&#8230;</p>
<p>If the planet had commonsense it would evict us all!!</p>
<p>Finally Jamie, if your Assessor did not &#8220;look&#8221; in the roof space report him/her to their Accreditation Body the details can be found in the report next to the Assessors contact details&#8230;standards must be maintained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Bridges</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-15556</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bridges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-15556</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Thank you for an interesting article.  
Regards,
Mike Bridges
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Thank you for an interesting article.<br />
Regards,<br />
Mike Bridges</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Shapps responds to Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) policy</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-14968</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Shapps responds to Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 08:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-14968</guid>
		<description>[...] Grant Shapps to change Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) delivery?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Grant Shapps to change Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) delivery?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-13995</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-13995</guid>
		<description>Grant Shapps is known for his interest and knowledge in the internet, and the power it holds, hence the interest. Politicians are wanting to market themselves, with an election, never is it so important. 

Labour could take a leaf out of Shapp&#039;s book for sure in this regard. The problem they have and this is not just Shapps and housing is that it is all well and good saying we will give you detail on issues, but then not being prepared to do so.

The saving caveat seems to be accross the board for the tories we need to be in governent before we give you the full details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grant Shapps is known for his interest and knowledge in the internet, and the power it holds, hence the interest. Politicians are wanting to market themselves, with an election, never is it so important. </p>
<p>Labour could take a leaf out of Shapp&#8217;s book for sure in this regard. The problem they have and this is not just Shapps and housing is that it is all well and good saying we will give you detail on issues, but then not being prepared to do so.</p>
<p>The saving caveat seems to be accross the board for the tories we need to be in governent before we give you the full details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynical</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-13993</link>
		<dc:creator>cynical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-13993</guid>
		<description>you have to say well done to Grant Shapps for their engagement, it is commendable. 

However, i will await to see their response and whether it actually answers any questions on this subject. One must ask is partial transparency and honesty actually transparency and honesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have to say well done to Grant Shapps for their engagement, it is commendable. </p>
<p>However, i will await to see their response and whether it actually answers any questions on this subject. One must ask is partial transparency and honesty actually transparency and honesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HIP-Consultant.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-13988</link>
		<dc:creator>HIP-Consultant.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-13988</guid>
		<description>We have received the initial response from Grant Shapps&#039;s office and are now awaiting further additional clarification in regard to the supplied response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have received the initial response from Grant Shapps&#8217;s office and are now awaiting further additional clarification in regard to the supplied response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HIP-Consultant.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-13851</link>
		<dc:creator>HIP-Consultant.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-13851</guid>
		<description>Hi Nigel,

Many thanks for the information which is gratefully received. Further details on Nigel&#039;s website can be found here www.homesmatter.co.uk

It must be noted that the information is from approx June 2009 and we seek confirmation whether this is still current Conservative policy.

The information indicates the Conservatives change in policy from the EPCs only being required at the end of the marketing process to a point similar to dates before 6th April 2009.

There is subtle differences between how EPCs are/were implemented prior to 6th April 2009 and they are now; which did give rise to abuse of the system which was removed when EPCs were required before marketing could legally commence.

EPCs are required at the start of the process at present. What is being possibly suggested (but is not clear in  our minds) is that an EPC must be ordered but NOT in place at the start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nigel,</p>
<p>Many thanks for the information which is gratefully received. Further details on Nigel&#8217;s website can be found here <a href="http://www.homesmatter.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.homesmatter.co.uk</a></p>
<p>It must be noted that the information is from approx June 2009 and we seek confirmation whether this is still current Conservative policy.</p>
<p>The information indicates the Conservatives change in policy from the EPCs only being required at the end of the marketing process to a point similar to dates before 6th April 2009.</p>
<p>There is subtle differences between how EPCs are/were implemented prior to 6th April 2009 and they are now; which did give rise to abuse of the system which was removed when EPCs were required before marketing could legally commence.</p>
<p>EPCs are required at the start of the process at present. What is being possibly suggested (but is not clear in  our minds) is that an EPC must be ordered but NOT in place at the start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Farren</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-13804</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Farren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-13804</guid>
		<description>Trust you have now received the email from Grant Shapps etc which I forwarded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust you have now received the email from Grant Shapps etc which I forwarded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HIP-Consultant.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-13778</link>
		<dc:creator>HIP-Consultant.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-13778</guid>
		<description>Hi Nigel,

We have looked where you suggested and see no evidence of intent from Grant Shapps. Have you listened to the NHBC lecture?

We have had acknowledgement from Grant Shapps&#039;s office that they have received our request for clarification and will post as and when we receive it.

If you have a written statement Nigel from Grant Shapps office we would be interested in reading it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nigel,</p>
<p>We have looked where you suggested and see no evidence of intent from Grant Shapps. Have you listened to the NHBC lecture?</p>
<p>We have had acknowledgement from Grant Shapps&#8217;s office that they have received our request for clarification and will post as and when we receive it.</p>
<p>If you have a written statement Nigel from Grant Shapps office we would be interested in reading it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Farren</title>
		<link>http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/grant-shapps-to-change-energy-performance-certificates-delivery-123/comment-page-1/#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Farren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hip-consultant.co.uk/blog/?p=2140#comment-13744</guid>
		<description>If the Tories were elected. they would NOT put the EPC at the rear of the selling process. It would stay as it is  have this in writing from Grant Shapps. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Tories were elected. they would NOT put the EPC at the rear of the selling process. It would stay as it is  have this in writing from Grant Shapps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 3/18 queries in 0.046 seconds using disk

Served from: www.hip-consultant.co.uk @ 2012-02-08 07:43:03 -->
